The truth about J.K Rowling (1)

A blog response to a facebook post @ http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/pages/Blackstones-World-Without-Walls-ES2007S/160623160652040

J.K rowling captivates her audiences? You had to be kidding me! You really meant she ensnares and enslaves her audiences? Cuz that is the only way she ever captivates ( in a bad way)! Something that captivates in a good way almost always ha...ve something edifying about and around it; something that captivates in a good way does not spellbind/enslave which in turn causes the ensnaring of your psyche/soul/mind/spirit. On the contrary something that captivates in a good way liberates your mind/soul/psyche/spirit; for instance watching a panaromic vista over a mountaintop! Enjoying a view most certainly does not enslave you isn't it? Neither does it ensnare you by the fact it doesnt enslave you, isnt it? It opens up the gates of your soul/mind/spirit/psyche instead; in a word it gives you freedom, isnt it? And the freedom in the sense of being able to choose NOT to be addicted/obsessed/enslaved to the vista precisely because the vista captivates differently (in a good way) than the Harry Potter books. You do not desire (obsessed/addicted) to see a vista the same way you would desire to read the next book in the Harry Potter Series, isnt it? The former kinda desire is clear-headed as glass and therefore detachable, the latter kinda desire is perpetual and therefore pathological because it withers the strength of your mind/soul/spirit/psyche. Or maybe I am just an idiot....