Wednesday, January 19, 2011

The truth about J.K Rowling (2)

A blog response to a facebook page @  http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/pages/Blackstones-World-Without-Walls-ES2007S/160623160652040
The issue with J.K Rowling is not that she writes well. The issue is the dark (unwholesome or morbid) content that is associated with her! It is the dark content that enslaves, not the good writing. The good writing can attract attention wh...ich is to captivate, but it does not enslave which is bad because there is something dark about enslavement, or don't anybody knows? This kinda enslavement isn't much different from tobacco/porn enslavement! And because these enslavements are dark that is also why it ensnares, because anything not dark cannot possibly enslave and hence neither can it ensnare! When something ensnares or enslaves, it abnormally preoccupies your psyche and senses to an obssession, and dark content in Rowling's series possesses the power to do that.

People do not sense this dark magnetic pull either because the dark contents have been too ingeniously packaged in measured quantities, or a case of mistaken identity---in which case the dark contents are deceptively 'white' ( or wholesome). And people who are heads-over-heels in love with her works or worst her person----nature/psyche/mind/soul, do not really know what they really are in love with!

A professional communicator who claims to be expert must logically be able to tell from Rowling's dark works something amiss in her nature/mind/soul/spirit/psyche or that her nature/mind/soul/spirit is dark, or so I think it has to be the case!! Because professional communicators are supposed to be equipped with the tools to 'see' beyond the verbal (in this case Rowling's written dark works) and non-verbal (in this case the deeper and darker motivation of Rowling's works!) cues to what goes on in the soul/spirit/psyche/mind of a person, isn't it? The highest level of professional communication is the ability to size up the mind/psyche/soul/spirit/nature of a person and communicate directly to their minds/souls/psyches, altogether bypassing the need to enact proper verbal and non-verbal cues appropriate only to interaction without full knowledge of every aspect of a person's psyche/nature/mind/soul.

And if people argue that dark contents do not necessarily imply a dark mind/soul/spirit/psyche, they have been misled! Simply because, dark content/works can only stem from dark anchors from within a dark mind/soul/nature/spirit/psyche, unless Rowling is deranged, in which case she is dark by default lol!

But jokes aside, to be able to write such dark contents on such a grand scale needs a certain sort of CLEAR DARK CONVICTION on top of clear planning/editing/choreographing/directing/scripting. Notice that the conviction is not only DARK, it is also so CLEAR, and this is presented in the great pull of her works. Such conviction also speaks volumes about the inner psyche/nature of Rowling and the sorts of things that drive Rowling (things which are obviously also dark!), her predispositions, sensibilities, inclinations, allegiances and affiliations!! You can't tell the nature of a man by the profession he is employed in, but you can almost certainly tell every of the nature of a man by the stuff he writes (or don't you see my nature/psyche now?), both the content that preoccupies his thoughts and the way he expresses those thoughts in writing---which is not so much skill as conviction ( because there is a difference between a convicted and skilful writer, though the 2 tend to be conflated).

Any expert professional communicator who can tell all the verbal and non-verbal cues in Rowling's works are dark and STILL resolutely chooses and desires to immerse himself in it are blameless as expert professional communicators. But if the communicator fails to see through the facade of colorful and youthful illustrations coupled with seemingly innocuous plot and storyline of Rowling's works, and mistakenly thinks white rather than dark, or bravo rather than boo, he needs a thorough reassessment of his professional communication credentials!


Cheers

No comments:

Post a Comment