Friday, January 28, 2011

Interpersonal Conflict (With edit for punctuation)

 Short fiction novel
A Cradle of Life
By
Principle author
Mark. G
Published 2011
National University of Singapore Press

John, English middle-aged, pretty, unassuming, mild-mannered, richly provided in every aspect of his life. He had in assets a precocious trophy wife, Casy: knowledgeable in every care of housewifery, fastidious about every of its perfection, who at once managed two honorable daughters who grew up to be equally competent and respecting; and a still blooming director’s career which seemed to define the man he was as much as it did the converse.

He took such an interest in his ship broker’s his life was almost fully given to it. Mainly he felt so alive. His other satisfactions came from meeting and working with myriad like-minded souls for a common objective, together with the solutions chartered he saw made a difference to the lives and organizations of the people around him. These, coupled with the success with which he went about such objectives, exerted such a stronghold on his psyche, it would haunt his other life.

He professed every so often to love his wife and daughters, but they could not feel one instance of real connection made by him with themselves, not since Ann and Susan graduated from high-school at Hartfields. Neither would Casy, his wife, complained if it had been occasional, but John had not taken Ann and Susan on weekend getaways at Randalls for too long to be even unfathomable.  When John in his right element would never so much as to turn down a chance to give an employee in distress his hand, you could not imagine him slighting similar requests of his closest kin in favor of personal interests; he did not even bother to show up for Susan’s 18th birthday.

Once when the family would make dinner together every other day an affair of religion, John was always the picture of the perfect dad at the dinner table, engaging effortlessly, purposefully, in after dinner table discussions of any shape and length, in any topic of any suggestion; one who was never afraid to laugh at his own ideas and antics both with Susan and Ann, but especially Casy, his first love, or feel embarrassed about making them. A score year later now, he had completely lost touch with being a man around his daughters and had not expressed physically, emotionally, verbally, anything admirable, romantically, to his wife in almost any aspect of her excellent femininity in a long while.

John had even stopped telling Casy he loves her, because she would for some cognitive fault of hers she did not have in the genial marriage past, instinctively read the diametrical opposite or that he rather loved her; and where once the loving exchange came about very daily, easily and naturally from himself to herself and conversely, now it felt very obliging and almost awkward, for they both had a conscience clear the vagaries of their relationship had simply not lived up to make sense of a pleasantry it once could.

Even if John envisioned a new life together, he could not in practice right away because himself estranged, he could not least expect her similarly alienated being, the real evil, delicate and highly sensitized by virtue of her femininity, to not require to re-assimilate in bits, physically, mentally, emotionally, verbally, into the proverbial bliss of marriage.

While Casy’s misfortune may lay only in her delicacy, the bigger misfortune and the other evil on her part, so John thinks, were the thorough misgivings she had towards him in almost every aspect of every other volition, idea, disposition, in every possible domain of life since the abrupt estrangement, and even after he sought reparations through repentance and her emotional reassurance. That was much too irrational and unreasonable to comprehend sometimes it was easier for John’s faculties to think that she had been through a lot, than try to alienate her further by contending her charges. The only doubt: John is two-minded the easy way is the right way out of the dreadful dysfunction; but neither can Casy be sure John will never hurt her and her daughters again, to be less vindictive and more willing to overlook minor disagreements with him in the future.

The  marriage relationship, consequently, had reached an impasse; the worst for Ann and Susan, who both though passed eighteen, somehow still affectedly scrutinize every way of their parents', and might have been dealt unfair treatment for having been too early acquainted with the evils that exist between a man and woman, and prematurely robbed of their innocence thus. They have every chance to litigate if the situation does not absolve in some positive way, according to the unalloyed, young hope that is in them.

John and Casy used to visit me twice weekly for marriage counseling at NUS Wellness Center. What do you think I said to them? Any approximations for the kids too? Say it; say your piece.

Special thanks to John and his wife, and their 2 beautiful daughters, for allowing me to share this vignette of theirs. The problem though has been resolved and their 3rd child, Brad, is testament to new found love. Still, I want to know what you think in the form of interpersonal solutions to like problems.

Love

7 comments:

  1. Sup Mark,

    I have a feeling that John needs to regain Casy's confidence in him because she has been too long estranged to the misfortune of the relationship.

    He can do this by verbally recommiting his love for her, as well as demonstrating overtly, clear acts of care and concern doing and undertaking suitable activities meant to strengthen the marriage bond.

    Hope that helps!

    Cheers

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Mark!

    Interesting format you have there! However, I do feel that the language used could be a little more simplified for a blog post so that readers could understand better.

    Do pardon me for my mediocre language skills if I did not understand your story correctly, but here goes my comments! I feel that John's workaholic character is the main culprit behind his and Casy's marriage problem. He should try to fork out more time for his family amidst his tight schedule, and try to mend the injured bond between him and his family.

    I'm also happy to hear that their problem has been resolved! May they live happily ever after! :D

    Hwee Teng

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks, Mark for this post.

    I appreciate your fictional take on the assignment, as I do your imagination. What I find a bit hard to swallow is the fact that your post is three times longer than the maximum recommended length. You are also so verbose in your use of descriptors ( "...an English middle-aged, pretty, unassuming, mild-mannered, richly ....") that I feel so weighed down even in the first paragraph that I hesitate to move forward. Precise professional communication this is not. And even for prose, the readability here is limited by you over-stretching your capabilities.

    Having studied and written fiction, I have a nearly natural inclination for being inspired by it and encouraging it. However, there is a time and place, Mark. There is also value in the economy of language a la Ernest Hemingway.

    Another aspect of your writing that bothers me here is your misuse of the semi colon, of other punctuation, and of sentence structure throughout. I realize there is a positive ring to "poetic license." But again this course and its focus is "professional communication." That means to me that standard forms should be used above the more eccentric ones. To help you focus, I'd like to list the sentences that veer from "correctness," but that would occupy far too much space.

    Can we talk about this instead?

    I note that you have only one reader comment besides mine. I wonder if your post's readability was an issue for others as well?

    Oh---I just noticed that language use and verbosity aside, there is a story being told here. I'm sorry. I get so bogged down by the language that I can't really grasp it. Hwee Teng says the same. Could we both be wrong?

    Let's talk, Mark.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Brad, we almost always need to talk on every matter big and small these days!! I should really think you are pandering than rebuking me. Haha!

    But even I was beginning to wonder if anybody ever saw this post; because it was written over a fortnight back. I was thinking people were really having a hectic CNY break, and had not time enough to leave but a trail of comments. But anyway, I was waiting for your comment first and foremost; and when that didn't come after so long too, I couldn't imagine you had forgotton you had one more student in me!

    The way I wrote was fully purposed, word for word, sentence for sentence, colon for colon. I just wanted to introduce a new style of writing seen in classical literature or prose. I had gotten tired of writing straight-laced professional arguments. I used to classical prose and still am; and at first, it didn’t one bit seem logical to me too, with all sorts of syntax-ing features and sentence arrangements. But through more frequent exposure and more fictional prose, I unconsciously found myself writing just like that too. That I must say I fully enjoy, because it helps me realize the potential for the English Language's elegance, delicacy and beauty, which also share common ground with PC; though I now think Spanish's far more subtle and beautiful. But anyway, even in my reply to you now, I cannot help the element of prose you might so detect.

    But rest assured I got it under control; this shall be a one-off prose treat in the assignment; given now friends like Hwee Teng, yourself, and soon to be a battalion others too, make bad society of prose. I'll surely have to relent on this.

    But I think prose can be one of the clearest and most concise forms of writing, given its patient and total understanding, which require time I know nobody has. Having started completely clueless about what was written in a prose by Oscar, Mark, or Jane; I took the patience to understand thus empathize with the characters in the tale, and it is a wonderful feeling to be privy in such matters, because prose is like a hidden emotional treasure, secret and esoteric. And I wanted to be one of those who can access at will into the psyche of Oscar, Mark, or Jane (last names not given), and the characters they orchestrated; because I wanted to be the one who could EMPATHIZE! And because I knew being able to do this then, would make me one of the very few who can understand what's written and EMPATHIZE. Isn't interpersonal communication about empathizing first and foremost to some degree? As much as it was my undoing for engaging everybody in prose, could it be that the rest of us here hadn't practiced enough of what they learned or preached, which is to empathize, have patience and understanding? Because these same ideals were required of me to dissect Oscar's, Mark's, Jane's and many other classical prose writers' works? Could it be that if my prose wasn't configured for professional communication's conventionalities, that everyone's responses to my prose hadn't also matched up in the same exact terms? You wouldn't say I am shifting the blame as well?

    Given these things above, my engaging everyone in prose, if anything, was an advantage. Simply because if one could take the time and effort and empathize and understand what was written about the characters and their affect, you would almost certainly drop to tears at such sorrowful state of the affairs between John and Casy. And that is also another reason in part for engaging everybody in prose; so that the interpersonal conflict can adorn more emotional reality, creating interference and illumination in every privy. Perhaps in retrospection, that might have been a bad idea!

    But not to worry, its time to move back to actual professional, conventional, boring writing! Haha! I just had, with the application letter, though I’m not sure if it made the grade; but certainly not the personal statement.

    Cheers

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Hwee Teng,

    I treat you with utmost regard; for only you had the bold to try to understand and empathize with John and Casy!

    This bodes well Hwee Teng, because it shows you have the gift of interpersonal communication! I shall look forward to learning from you instead!

    Cheers

    ReplyDelete