Saturday, March 5, 2011

Culture must be illusion!!!

Brad and some classmates didn't think culture was illusion enough. Here is everything why they might be wrong:

Was I really out of my mind when I told a classmate or wrote in my blog that culture was anything but not an illusion?

Simply because saying otherwise that would have been inconsistent with the teachings of arbiter Plato! Unless Plato was out of his mind himself which could not possibly be because all of philosophy present and past borne out of his! It couldn't be any surprise too, that Shakespearan circles proclaim: "all the world's a stage"; and we silly actors and actresses!!! Shakespeare reaffirms here the theatrical production define by and defining its cast who themselves are one. If this is not convincing enough yet; let us dwell on the actualities of lingua. A stage is theatric is therefore make-believe is half-truth is illusion is deception!!! Everything we see in Les Miserables is a deception; both the state of utterances and emotions of the players who try so hard to evoke real-life experiences and accounts of players in similar roles. On that note and in fact, any reenactment of history in a drama or movie is somewhat an illusion or deception because you cannot revisit and realize exact state of mind for like state of mind, exact feeling or exact unfeeling for like feeling or like unfeeling, word for word, exact situational background for like situational background, once again!!! Something must be more true to make impotent this stance of mine!!!

For my part, I myself am a walking illusion and deception, because I do not carry the same two states of minds, mood; or atomic/electron configurations in these to every ES2007S class!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And so is everybody and everything else material or immaterial in this world!!!!!

And yes, even immaterial and abstract in culture or virtue or whatever is, wherein you may have originally misconceived these as unchanging and absolute because you had previously thought that immaterial stuff were supposed to interrelate absolutism because it was intuitive to think likewise: but as long as the immaterial and abstract were of this world and man-made, they were not the actual immaterial and abstract and absolute that were doctrinal (I'm sure Brad know what I mean)!!! Fundamental immaterialism is completely different from earthly ones; the former stays in one place forever, but not the latter.

Cheers

No comments:

Post a Comment