The Philosophy of Sex (2)

Agent Jonathan will chase after a girl he likes if doing so gets him her. Might there be an issue with that sex philosophy?

Hey Jonathan, good question that you just raised!

But why are you wanting to approach the girl? If you had everything, she WILL DRAW TO YOU INSTEAD, Jonathan!!!!!!!!

The whole philosophy of love and relationships of today's starry-eyed youths are totally off-tangent, and UNDOCTRINAL!!!! I'm of course sometimes guilty of that sort of thinking too, because I'm also youth!!!!

But courtship at the HIGHEST AND MOST RESOLVED LEVEL, IS ABOUT DRAWING PEOPLE TO US, NOT THE OTHER WAY ROUND!!!!!!! That is the REAL PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE AND RELATIONSHIPS; OR FOR THAT MATTER ANY AREA OF LIFE AND LIVING!!!!!!!

Of course for guys, socialization has taught us that we must make the first initiative in pursuit of the girl of our dreams, but that mustn't get overstated. Guys, BASED ON THE FUNDAMENTAL PHILOSOPHY ABOVE, should moderate their pursuit of girls of their dreams!! So this brings us back to the basal philosophy of moderation, something that I lost count of how many times I mentioned in all my posts on my blog and here on facebook. I think I mentioned moderation, as a doctrinal princple to anything in life and living about close to 20 times already.

On top of that, I think guys should bias on the safe side of moderation in their pursuit of girls of their dreams. They should really totally give no regard for the importance of pursuit, rather they should hold in higher regard disciplining themselves and their dispositions, achievements, traits, values, virtues, ethics so that these can potentially become attractive enough to draw in the GIRL OF HIS DREAMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now that is the ACTUALITY, PRECURSOR AND AVOWMENT OF A SOLID, LONG-LASTING, POWERFUL, ALL-WEATHER FOUNDATION OF A STRONG RELATIONSHIP, MARRIAGE OR WHATEVER!!!!!!!

The above powerful philosophy is of course uncompatible with the emphasis of today's media and pop world on illusions of personal appearance and corporeal endowments or gifts.

But there is also a blatant weakness in my arguments in my above latest 2 posts. It is hopefully evident to anyone who reads it. There is an unmistakable loophole, and any sharp-minded youth or Brad can see right through it in an instant!!!

Cheers